Avatar of test

by

I believe that he did.

28/10/2018 in Uncategorized

Originally Posted by Neverfly Yeah, I made a really long post, too. I know I need to learn a lot about it. Don’t bother. Read it, if you’re going to comment at all, eh? I didn’t type all that for my health. Originally Posted by Flick Montana Why is a science forum which is biased toward actual science a bad thing? To speak on behalf of Therapy, from what I read, Therapy is discounting his own involvement and pointing toward a bias of moderation and participation, not of scientific analysis. Will he take that as you calling him stupid?Probably, even though you didn’t.It’s a catch 22 and it’s worth hashing it out in this thread, for all to examine and lend their input.

And AlexG, I have defended you heavily in private conversations a lot and must admit that I am uncertain as to whether or not you’ve ever been worth the effort. Why should that be a bad thing? I almost didn’t read it. Hello Therapy,I am on several forums and the one I spend the most time on is a freethought and rationalism discussion board. Some things in moderation.Every last one of us struggles with this dilemma to some degree.

It was the last statement that hinted at a moderator bias toward science-minded posters that confused me. I never had a run in with any of the mods and I’ve never really experienced their bias. I’ll keep that in mind- because I’ve been itching to say it for a while: Stop acting like everyone that doesn’t know everything you do is mentally challenged.Wait for them to demonstrate that they are, first.And while I’m in full Neverfly mode… Say something stupid like that, I’m liable to get all dramatic and tell you it was stupid.ETA: So much for glaringly obvious- examine why:You make a comment that’s totally off base. Revise my post history. You got it.Feel free to earn the status you’ve worked so hard to achieve: Forum jerk that contributes little in the way of meaningful content. I think I’ll just bow out of the drama threads.

Originally Posted by Flick Montana I think I’ll just bow out of the drama threads. Revise my post history. More often than not, I give some benefit of the doubt. I will PM you the site address. Drama is a label you can apply to anything people might do that you would benefit from.

So, I keep it to myself when I see him act like an asshat.It’s not my place to tell him how to act.And I don’t want to tick him off and get on his bad side. I think it’s not too much to ask that others around here admit that, too.The only remaining contention is whether or not Therapy deserved his suspensions. Originally Posted by AlexG And AlexG, I have defended you heavily in private conversations a lot and must admit that I am uncertain as to whether or not you’ve ever been worth the effort. I went back up and forced myself through it. I’ve explained the frustration that comes from cranks inundating forums, year after year and how they often pretend to be interested in learning while only pushing a crank agenda.If any of those I’ve done this in PM with have the balls to come forward- they can confirm this.So it’s not all personal attack, here. You got it.Feel free to earn the status you’ve worked so hard to achieve: Forum jerk that contributes little in the way of meaningful content.

Please do bow out. Why comment on it way off base if you didn’t read it? Does that seem right, to you?Then you make a second comment that’s totally off base. Yeah, I made a really long post, too. I like Dywyddyr, so I show a bias toward his harshness.

Why is a science forum which is biased toward actual science a bad thing? It’s certainly one of your more odious characteristics. This is one of those shades of gray. Provide some balance. You fairly reek of self-righteous.

Originally Posted by Flick Montana I guess I can’t really comment any further. It was the last statement that hinted at a moderator bias toward science-minded posters that confused me. Unlikely. You, me, Dywyddyr, PhDemon, Strange, PumaMan (Wherever you are), tk421…Some of us animals are more ‘badly’ than others…I’m just as guilty.But I’ll toot my own horn for a moment. I never had a run in with any of the mods and I’ve never really experienced their bias. No need.

Yeah, I made a really long post, too. There’s the old expression, “Better to stay silent and have others think you’re a fool…” you know the rest.Why not let the cranks fully expose themselves as cranks before calling them a crank? “Better to stay silent and let them confirm they are a fool, first.”Insults have their purpose- their time and place and it shouldn’t be all the time as it seems to be lately. Originally Posted by Some Yes, Obviously, It is. Sorry, I’ll admit, I only read the beginning and end. May as well go all the way.AlexG, if you cannot provide a reasonable explanation why something is crap, trash, garbage, phooey, hunkydoreydragonsnot- Save it.I’ve seen you post well and seen you explain things out- so why don’t you do that the majority of the time instead of just growling “trash, trash, trash!”? (although, lately, I have seen you going more into detail than you used to.) Originally Posted by Dywyddyr This one’s bothered me for a while.What’s “ETA”?

ETA= Edit To Add.Picked that one up back in my old BAUT days and I always assume everyone knows what it means.So I will ETA here:Some of you have no idea how many times I have defended you in PM to others that were rolling on the floor in anger. Originally Posted by AlexG And AlexG, I have defended you heavily in private conversations a lot and must admit that I am uncertain as to whether or not you’ve ever been worth the effort. There is a Science and Skepticism forum as well. If only you would.You’re a major perpetrator of pseudoscience and rubbish.Although I suppose you actually meant “review”. I believe that he did. It may seem impressive to you but to others, your opinion carries very little weight. But we all must weigh in on that balance between helpful guidance and harsh criticism.

If you call the idea stupid- were you wrong to do so? Not really. An ant can lift up to 20 times it’s body weight. Well, not a glaringly obvious one, anyway.Therapy, in his complaint- has raised a valid point and I think it’s one that Many Of Us have been thinking for a while, now.We’re being too jumpy. But they were suspensions, not permanent… and the Mods should probably try to explain the reasons art essay writing service
why to him.ETA: Hey look! I made a long burn your eyes post, too! For some it may be a hell of a struggle while for others it is very slight.

I don’t get to calling someone an idiot until they really push my buttons.I don’t say it in every danged post. Originally Posted by Some Revise my post history. Yes, Obviously, It is. And AlexG, I have defended you heavily in private conversations a lot and must admit that I am uncertain as to whether or not you’ve ever been worth the effort.

Too quick to label. When corrected, you admit you did not even read the O.P. Originally Posted by Neverfly So, I keep it to myself when I see him act like an asshat. I’m just out to get him.So, I think I can say this without being a hypocrite. Don’t bother. Unlikely. It wasn’t so bad once I got rolling.It’s not that he believes the mods are biased toward the science minded people but toward the established members in general.Frankly, I agree with that to a limited degree- on any forum the mods will show a slight bias toward established members- I find that inevitable and unavoidable and I think it’s a positive thing for a board as it’s a perk to establish yourself rather than seagull post.In a perfect world, perhaps, all members would be treated equally. Impressive as that is, they can not only lift it- but carry it great distance.

It may well be the type of venue you are looking for. I’m harsh and I’m critical- but go over my posts. Read it, if you’re going to comment at all, eh? I didn’t type all that for my health. I don’t post things like, “Trash this crap” with no explanation as to why it’s wrong.I don’t think an explanation of what’s wrong is too much to ask, right?I’ve PMed mods with appeals for bans on cranks and more often than not, those I defend come back with their sock wedged up their fist and I’ve made a fool of myself.About the only member I vigorously attack while frothing at the mouth is Harold- but that’s not because I’m biased..

Didn’t learn the first time, eh?When confronted on that, you blame others, as Therapy is doing in his O.P. and call it drama, rather than you commenting in ignorance and then getting very slightly huffy over it. (or at least snarky).Harsh Criticism warranted- you demonstrated a failure to learn, to self examine and accept personal responsibility for your posts.Now go take a seat next to Therapy. Originally Posted by Flick Montana Sorry, I’ll admit, I only read the beginning and end. It’s not really my style. I’ve spent a lot of time explaining the reasons and the benefits to others of harsh criticism and probable causes of them coming under fire. I often find his contributions worthwhile. And I don’t want to tick him off and get on his bad side.

I never had a run in with any of the mods and I’ve never really experienced their bias. But the bias really is there.And the fact is, sometimes the harshness is needed. I am more allowing to it, than I am to say, Theorist.I’m not a mod, though- so I can kinda get away with it. ETA: Hey look! I made a long burn your eyes post, too!

This one’s bothered me for a while.What’s “ETA”?PS: I do have a actual response, but it’ll wait… It’s not really my style. And I think none of us would enjoy that perfect world very much, truth told.To quote George Orwell, “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”It can be necessary in this kind of setting.I do not agree with how far he went galloping off with his suspicions.However, let’s examine this objectively…We have all, every one of us, been acting badly. Don’t bother. I guess I can’t really comment any further. Originally Posted by Dywyddyr And I don’t want to tick him off and get on his bad side. They are a well rounded forum with a foundation of global community and high standards for discussion.

From the perspective of the ant, this may seem like quite a feat.But to us, the thing picked up 0.004 grams.Considering how biased you are in favor of some of the most anti-scientific claims ever seen- You are like that ant. Why should that be a bad thing? Read it, if you’re going to comment at all, eh? I didn’t type all that for my health. Originally Posted by Neverfly Originally Posted by Flick Montana I guess I can’t really comment any further.

I’ve been quite vocal in advocating it.But come on- that doesn’t mean deliver only harshness. Too harsh in criticism and not forthcoming with the explanations.I’m going to single out Dywyddyr now.This is a member I respect and appreciate. Just because I am advocating less harsh criticism doesn’t mean I’m advocating no harsh criticism.

Let people see that you’re willing to help them see an error before you go bashing their skulls in.

Comments are closed.

http://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/amoxil-online.html http://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/purchase-amoxicillin.html